GONUTS has been updated to MW1.31 Most things seem to be working but be sure to report problems.
Cacao
| GO:0098020 | virus tail, minor subunit | PMID:22923442 | IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay | C | ||||
| This annotation made on page: 9CAUD:A0A024B0X2 By: Heatheca (group Team ContaminatorZ) on 2016-03-28 03:54:37 CDT. | ||||||||
| Team | Points |
|---|---|
| Team Blue B | 0 |
| Team ContaminatorZ | 0 |
| Team Kendrick Jafars | 2 |
| Team Red A | 1 |
| Team Snorlax | 2 |
| Team You can't B. cereus | 1 |
You must be logged in to challenge this annotation.
| Entry Type | Challenging User,Group | Time/Date | Challenge Reason | Points/Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Challenge | Khana25, Team Snorlax | 2016-05-16 18:27:06 CDT | The notes section is lacking any detail or explanation of what portion of the literature displays the function of the protein. In addition, this paper discusses the phage HK620, and it doesn't mention the connection to Bacillus Phage Evoli, so I believe this should be a transfer annotation. In the case that it should be a transfer annotation, the GO ID: should actually be GO_REF:0000100 instead of what you have. | 2 |
| Challenge | Mnguy1, Team Blue B | 2016-03-30 14:44:39 CDT | I believe the paper determine the function of the tail spike protein via mutant assay rather than direct assay by exchanging E372 and D 339 for A. and the GO term is incorrect if you use the protein in this paper as reference. | 0 |
| Challenge | Shasan, Team Kendrick Jafars | 2016-03-30 10:41:00 CDT | The paper talks about phage HK620 and it's tail spike protein. The paper does not mention any affiliation to Bacillus Phage Evoli so the annotation should be a standard annotation for phage HK620, or a transfer annotation for Evoli, but there is no homology to allow for a transfer annotation. The paper talks about direct assay for HK620 but none of that relates to Evoli. | 2 |
| Challenge | Di46616, Team Red A | 2016-03-30 10:38:12 CDT | You should explain how the function was determined, not just say the article determined it. | 1 |
| Challenge | All5, Team You can't B. cereus | 2016-03-30 09:33:51 CDT | The paper talks about a tail spike protein while you are looking at a minor sub unit of the virus tail. There is no evidence that these are the same thing. Change your GO term. | 1 |
| Private Assessment | Suzialeksander | 2016-06-02 16:13:55 CDT | You need to be an instructor to view these notes. | Unacceptable |
| Public Assessment | DanielRenfro | 2016-05-16 18:27:06 CDT | This annotation has been flagged because it has been challenged since last assessment | Flagged |
| Public Assessment | JimHu | 2016-04-20 15:36:01 CDT | This should be a transfer annotation | Requires Changes ✗ Publication |
