GONUTS has been updated to MW1.31 Most things seem to be working but be sure to report problems.

Have any questions? Please email us at ecoliwiki@gmail.com

Category:Team Everything Burrito

From GONUTS
Jump to: navigation, search
StatusPageUserDate/TimeGO Term (Aspect)ReferenceEvidenceNotesLinks
updatedbyinstructor9BETR:D9YZJ6Zstielper, Team Everything Burrito2013-02-10 16:43:53 CSTGO:0046718 viral entry into host cell (P)PMID:11836391ECO:0000314 direct assay evidence used in manual assertion

Figure 1

challenge
updatedbyinstructorJSRV:ENVZstielper, Team Everything Burrito2013-02-10 16:14:06 CSTGO:0016032 viral process (P)PMID:16873259ECO:0000314 direct assay evidence used in manual assertion

Fig. 3. The figure indicates that this protein is involved in viral particle production, but this doesn't necessarily include the transfer of virions.

challenge
updatedbyinstructorHUMAN:IFM3Zstielper, Team Everything Burrito2013-02-10 13:28:03 CSTGO:0046597 negative regulation of viral entry into host cell (P)PMID:23358889ECO:0000315 mutant phenotype evidence used in manual assertion

Figues 1, particularly B, and 3 indicate that IFITM3 protein acts as a defense mechanism against viral membrane fusion.

challenge
acceptableHUMAN:IFM2Zstielper, Team Everything Burrito2013-02-10 13:25:01 CSTGO:0046597 negative regulation of viral entry into host cell (P)PMID:23358889ECO:0000314 direct assay evidence used in manual assertion

Figues 1, particularly B, and 3 indicate that IFITM2 protein acts as a defense mechanism against viral membrane fusion.

challenge
acceptableHV1BR:TATJbeasley, Team Everything Burrito2013-02-10 13:19:46 CSTGO:1900182 positive regulation of protein localization to nucleus (P)PMID:22219277ECO:0000314 direct assay evidence used in manual assertion

Figure 1C indicates that the tat protein triggers the ZO-1 protein localization to the nucleus. This is shown by significantly increased ZO-1 expression in the nucleus of adenovirus-infected hCMEC/D3 cells depicted in the bar graph in Figure 1C.

challenge
unacceptableHUMAN:IFM1Zstielper, Team Everything Burrito2013-02-10 13:17:49 CSTGO:0046597 regulation of defense response to virus by host (P)PMID:23358889ECO:0000314 direct assay evidence used in manual assertion

Figues 1, particularly B, and 3 indicate that IFITM1 protein acts as a defense mechanism against viral membrane fusion.

challenge
updatedbyinstructorHV1BR:TATJbeasley, Team Everything Burrito2013-02-10 13:06:18 CSTGO:0052312 modulation of transcription in other organism involved in symbiotic interaction (P)PMID:22593154ECO:0000314 direct assay evidence used in manual assertion

Figure 3A demonstrates that the Tat addition to Jurkat T cells caused a 10.8-fold increase in Human Endogenous Retrovirus Type-K (HML-2) gag RNA production after 6 hours. This concludes that the tat protein activates the expression of HML-2.

challenge
acceptableHV1BR:TATJbeasley, Team Everything Burrito2013-02-10 12:40:30 CSTGO:0051092 positive regulation of NF-kappaB transcription factor activity (P)PMID:10400814ECO:0000314 direct assay evidence used in manual assertion

Figure 3B shows the gel retardation analysis of NF-kappaB complexes induced by Tat in both NIH 3T3 and PKR knockout mouse cells. The analysis reveals that neither the tat protein nor the PKR (a Cellular Interferon-Inducible, Double-Stranded RNA-Dependent Protein Kinase) can activate the NF-kappa-B transcription factor (lanes 1 and 2). When the tat protein and PKR worked together (Lane 3), this produced a positive activation of NF-kappaB. This proves that the tat protein must activate NF-kappaB through PKR.

challenge
updatedbyinstructorHV1BR:TATJbeasley, Team Everything Burrito2013-02-08 17:53:47 CSTGO:1901856 negative regulation of cellular respiration (P)PMID:17202348ECO:0000314 direct assay evidence used in manual assertion

Figure 3 demonstrates the inhibiting effect of the tat protein on mitochondrial complexes III and IV while having no effect on complexes I and II. The ETC activity of an isolated mitochondrial protein was monitored after adding tat protein, and the graph (A) shows the effect that the tat treatment had on each complex. Complexes III and IV show inhibited activity once the tat protein was introduced. (B) shows the concentration dependent inhibition of complex IV activity.

challenge
acceptableHV1BR:TATJbeasley, Team Everything Burrito2013-02-07 14:40:22 CSTGO:0060081 membrane hyperpolarization (P)PMID:17202348ECO:0000314 direct assay evidence used in manual assertion

Figure 1 shows that adding tat protein to cortical neurons caused a 10% loss in rhod123 fluorescence which is a measurement method of mitochondrial membrane potential. This result proves that the tat protein induces mitochondrial hyperpolarization.

challenge


What do the icons mean in the status column?

assessment icons.jpg

Pages in category "Team Everything Burrito"

The following 2 pages are in this category, out of 2 total.


Jump to pages starting with: J Z