Challenge | KAtanasoff, Team Blue A 2019 | 2019-04-15 10:02:49 CDT | The figure you cite shows neither that the gene product of 39.2 colocalizes with the GroEL-GroES complex, nor that it is a cellular component. A more appropriate GO term would probably be something that emphasizes how the 39.2 gene product is essential for T4 bacteriophage growth in certain hosts.
| 2 |
Challenge | CXie, Team Red B 2019 | 2019-04-15 09:39:29 CDT | I disagree with the wording of this note, particularly “little to no plaques,” because plaques are still seen for the T4 39.2 phage mutant on the E. coli groEL44 host. This note also fails to distinguish between the E. coli groEL44 strain and the E. coli control. There is no explanation for the significance of a groE mutation. I disagree with the ECO term because the mutation is an “in-frame-deletion,” not an insertion. The ECO term should be ECO:0001175 Deletion mutation phenotypic evidence used in manual assertion.
| 1 |
Public Assessment | Ivanerill | 2019-04-21 16:32:21 CDT | | Acceptable
✔ Protein ✔ Publication ✔ Qualifier ✔ Go term ✔ Evidence ✔ With/From ✔ Notes ✔ Unique/Original
|
Public Assessment | DanielRenfro | 2019-04-21 16:22:25 CDT | This annotation has been flagged because it has been edited since last assessment
Qualifier |
GO ID |
GO term name |
Reference |
ECO ID |
ECO term name |
with/from |
Aspect |
Extension |
Notes |
Status
|
|
GO:1903332 |
regulation of protein folding |
PMID:22234860 |
ECO:0001165 |
IMP: Inferred from Mutant Phenotype |
|
P |
|
Gp39.2, which is a bacteriophage T4 protein, is believed to modulate the host's (E. coli) GroEL/GroES chaperone machine, which aids in the correct folding of both host and bacteriophage proteins. Gp39.2 is thought to play a part in correctly folding the E. coli host protein UmuC, which is part of the DNA Polymerase V complex. The authors believe that the GroEL/GroES complex is required for the DNA PolV to work and proofread in the bacteria cell. This relationship between Gp39.2 and DNA PolV is illustrated in Figure 5 where an E. coli mutant (that was only a mutant for isolation purposes for plating) was plated with and without the plasmid containing Gp39.2. The bacterium were then exposed to UV irradiation and were grown with and without arabinose, which showed which mutant bacteria had Gp39.2 in them. The Gp39.2 mutant bacteria were much more frequently seen while plating as opposed to the non-Gp39.2 mutant bacteria. |
complete CACAO 13727
| on BPT4:D9IE38
| Flagged
|
Public Assessment | Ivanerill | 2019-04-21 16:20:28 CDT | what is being manually counted?
| Requires Changes
✗ Evidence
|
Public Assessment | DanielRenfro | 2019-04-21 16:09:58 CDT | This annotation has been flagged because it has been edited since last assessment
Qualifier |
GO ID |
GO term name |
Reference |
ECO ID |
ECO term name |
with/from |
Aspect |
Extension |
Notes |
Status
|
|
GO:1903332 |
regulation of protein folding |
PMID:22234860 |
ECO:0007118 |
IMP: Inferred from Mutant Phenotype |
|
P |
|
Gp39.2, which is a bacteriophage T4 protein, is believed to modulate the host's (E. coli) GroEL/GroES chaperone machine, which aids in the correct folding of both host and bacteriophage proteins. Gp39.2 is thought to play a part in correctly folding the E. coli host protein UmuC, which is part of the DNA Polymerase V complex. The authors believe that the GroEL/GroES complex is required for the DNA PolV to work and proofread in the bacteria cell. This relationship between Gp39.2 and DNA PolV is illustrated in Figure 5 where an E. coli mutant (that was only a mutant for isolation purposes for plating) was plated with and without the plasmid containing Gp39.2. The bacterium were then exposed to UV irradiation and were grown with and without arabinose, which showed which mutant bacteria had Gp39.2 in them. The Gp39.2 mutant bacteria were much more frequently seen while plating as opposed to the non-Gp39.2 mutant bacteria. |
complete CACAO 13727
| on BPT4:D9IE38
| Flagged
|
Public Assessment | Ivanerill | 2019-04-21 15:59:55 CDT | getting there for ECO, but not quite. all the authors do is look at the frequency (i.e. count) of spontaneous mutants capable of growing a colony on rifamycin plates
| Requires Changes
✗ Evidence
|
Public Assessment | DanielRenfro | 2019-04-21 15:53:08 CDT | This annotation has been flagged because it has been edited since last assessment
Qualifier |
GO ID |
GO term name |
Reference |
ECO ID |
ECO term name |
with/from |
Aspect |
Extension |
Notes |
Status
|
|
GO:1903332 |
regulation of protein folding |
PMID:22234860 |
ECO:0007185 |
IMP: Inferred from Mutant Phenotype |
|
P |
|
Gp39.2, which is a bacteriophage T4 protein, is believed to modulate the host's (E. coli) GroEL/GroES chaperone machine, which aids in the correct folding of both host and bacteriophage proteins. Gp39.2 is thought to play a part in correctly folding the E. coli host protein UmuC, which is part of the DNA Polymerase V complex. The authors believe that the GroEL/GroES complex is required for the DNA PolV to work and proofread in the bacteria cell. This relationship between Gp39.2 and DNA PolV is illustrated in Figure 5 where an E. coli mutant (that was only a mutant for isolation purposes for plating) was plated with and without the plasmid containing Gp39.2. The bacterium were then exposed to UV irradiation and were grown with and without arabinose, which showed which mutant bacteria had Gp39.2 in them. The Gp39.2 mutant bacteria were much more frequently seen while plating as opposed to the non-Gp39.2 mutant bacteria. |
complete CACAO 13727
| on BPT4:D9IE38
| Flagged
|
Public Assessment | Ivanerill | 2019-04-21 15:40:46 CDT | No notes given. | Requires Changes
✔ Go term ✗ Evidence
|
Public Assessment | DanielRenfro | 2019-04-21 15:39:24 CDT | This annotation has been flagged because it has been edited since last assessment
Qualifier |
GO ID |
GO term name |
Reference |
ECO ID |
ECO term name |
with/from |
Aspect |
Extension |
Notes |
Status
|
|
GO:1903332 |
regulation of protein folding |
PMID:22234860 |
ECO:0006023 |
IMP: Inferred from Mutant Phenotype |
|
P |
|
Gp39.2, which is a bacteriophage T4 protein, is believed to modulate the host's (E. coli) GroEL/GroES chaperone machine, which aids in the correct folding of both host and bacteriophage proteins. Gp39.2 is thought to play a part in correctly folding the E. coli host protein UmuC, which is part of the DNA Polymerase V complex. The authors believe that the GroEL/GroES complex is required for the DNA PolV to work and proofread in the bacteria cell. This relationship between Gp39.2 and DNA PolV is illustrated in Figure 5 where an E. coli mutant (that was only a mutant for isolation purposes for plating) was plated with and without the plasmid containing Gp39.2. The bacterium were then exposed to UV irradiation and were grown with and without arabinose, which showed which mutant bacteria had Gp39.2 in them. The Gp39.2 mutant bacteria were much more frequently seen while plating as opposed to the non-Gp39.2 mutant bacteria. |
complete CACAO 13727
| on BPT4:D9IE38
| Flagged
|
Public Assessment | DanielRenfro | 2019-04-21 15:33:27 CDT | This annotation has been flagged because it has been edited since last assessment
Qualifier |
GO ID |
GO term name |
Reference |
ECO ID |
ECO term name |
with/from |
Aspect |
Extension |
Notes |
Status
|
|
GO:1903332 |
regulation of protein folding |
PMID:22234860 |
ECO:0005667 |
IMP: Inferred from Mutant Phenotype |
|
P |
|
Gp39.2, which is a bacteriophage T4 protein, is believed to modulate the host's (E. coli) GroEL/GroES chaperone machine, which aids in the correct folding of both host and bacteriophage proteins. Gp39.2 is thought to play a part in correctly folding the E. coli host protein UmuC, which is part of the DNA Polymerase V complex. The authors believe that the GroEL/GroES complex is required for the DNA PolV to work and proofread in the bacteria cell. This relationship between Gp39.2 and DNA PolV is illustrated in Figure 5 where an E. coli mutant (that was only a mutant for isolation purposes for plating) was plated with and without the plasmid containing Gp39.2. The bacterium were then exposed to UV irradiation and were grown with and without arabinose, which showed which mutant bacteria had Gp39.2 in them. The Gp39.2 mutant bacteria were much more frequently seen while plating as opposed to the non-Gp39.2 mutant bacteria. |
complete CACAO 13727
| on BPT4:D9IE38
| Flagged
|
Public Assessment | DanielRenfro | 2019-04-21 15:31:27 CDT | This annotation has been flagged because it has been edited since last assessment
Qualifier |
GO ID |
GO term name |
Reference |
ECO ID |
ECO term name |
with/from |
Aspect |
Extension |
Notes |
Status
|
|
GO:1903332 |
regulation of protein folding |
PMID:22234860 |
ECO:0005667 |
IMP: Inferred from Mutant Phenotype |
|
P |
other:UniProtKB - D9IE38 |
Gp39.2, which is a bacteriophage T4 protein, is believed to modulate the host's (E. coli) GroEL/GroES chaperone machine, which aids in the correct folding of both host and bacteriophage proteins. Gp39.2 is thought to play a part in correctly folding the E. coli host protein UmuC, which is part of the DNA Polymerase V complex. The authors believe that the GroEL/GroES complex is required for the DNA PolV to work and proofread in the bacteria cell. This relationship between Gp39.2 and DNA PolV is illustrated in Figure 5 where an E. coli mutant (that was only a mutant for isolation purposes for plating) was plated with and without the plasmid containing Gp39.2. The bacterium were then exposed to UV irradiation and were grown with and without arabinose, which showed which mutant bacteria had Gp39.2 in them. The Gp39.2 mutant bacteria were much more frequently seen while plating as opposed to the non-Gp39.2 mutant bacteria. |
complete CACAO 13727
| on BPT4:D9IE38
| Flagged
|
Public Assessment | Ivanerill | 2019-04-21 15:26:15 CDT | GO is incorrect. Read your own notes and figure out what kind of function is 39.2 likely to have
"thought to play a part in correctly folding the E. coli host protein UmuC, which is part of the DNA"
Remove the extension unless it is necessary.
As for the evidence, this pretty much sums it up: The Gp39.2 mutant bacteria were much more frequently seen while plating as opposed to the non-Gp39.2 mutant bacteria.
| Requires Changes
✔ Protein ✔ Publication ✔ Qualifier ✗ Go term ✗ Evidence ✔ With/From ✔ Notes ✔ Unique/Original
|
Public Assessment | DanielRenfro | 2019-04-21 14:17:24 CDT | This annotation has been flagged because it has been edited since last assessment
Qualifier |
GO ID |
GO term name |
Reference |
ECO ID |
ECO term name |
with/from |
Aspect |
Extension |
Notes |
Status
|
|
GO:1900262 |
regulation of DNA-directed DNA polymerase activity |
PMID:22234860 |
ECO:0005667 |
IMP: Inferred from Mutant Phenotype |
|
P |
other:UniProtKB - D9IE38 |
Gp39.2, which is a bacteriophage T4 protein, is believed to modulate the host's (E. coli) GroEL/GroES chaperone machine, which aids in the correct folding of both host and bacteriophage proteins. Gp39.2 is thought to play a part in correctly folding the E. coli host protein UmuC, which is part of the DNA Polymerase V complex. The authors believe that the GroEL/GroES complex is required for the DNA PolV to work and proofread in the bacteria cell. This relationship between Gp39.2 and DNA PolV is illustrated in Figure 5 where an E. coli mutant (that was only a mutant for isolation purposes for plating) was plated with and without the plasmid containing Gp39.2. The bacterium were then exposed to UV irradiation and were grown with and without arabinose, which showed which mutant bacteria had Gp39.2 in them. The Gp39.2 mutant bacteria were much more frequently seen while plating as opposed to the non-Gp39.2 mutant bacteria. |
complete CACAO 13727
| on BPT4:D9IE38
| Flagged
|
Public Assessment | Ivanerill | 2019-04-21 09:49:28 CDT | GO term does not correspond with notes or evidence in article
| Requires Changes
✗ Go term
|
Public Assessment | DanielRenfro | 2019-04-21 07:39:24 CDT | This annotation has been flagged because it has been edited since last assessment
Qualifier |
GO ID |
GO term name |
Reference |
ECO ID |
ECO term name |
with/from |
Aspect |
Extension |
Notes |
Status
|
|
GO:0033892 |
deoxyribonuclease (pyrimidine dimer) activity |
PMID:22234860 |
ECO:0001175 |
IMP: Inferred from Mutant Phenotype |
|
F |
other:UniProtKB - D9IE38 |
Figure 6 illustrates the insertion/substitution vector system of the Bacteriophage T4 in its host, Escherichia coli. While the figure shows a plaque assay, that visualization results from an in-frame deletion of the 39.2 gene of T4, which is believed to modulate the host's (E. coli) GroEL/GroES chaperone machine, which aids in the correct folding of both host and bacteriophage proteins. |
complete CACAO 13727
| on BPT4:D9IE38
| Flagged
|
Public Assessment | Ivanerill | 2019-04-20 04:51:12 CDT | Don't focus on the qualifiers/extensions. Figure out first what you are annotating.
| Requires Changes
✔ Go term
|
Public Assessment | DanielRenfro | 2019-04-19 20:27:35 CDT | This annotation has been flagged because it has been edited since last assessment
Qualifier |
GO ID |
GO term name |
Reference |
ECO ID |
ECO term name |
with/from |
Aspect |
Extension |
Notes |
Status
|
|
GO:0033892 |
GroEL-GroES complex |
PMID:22234860 |
ECO:0001175 |
IMP: Inferred from Mutant Phenotype |
|
C |
other:UniProtKB - D9IE38 |
Figure 6 illustrates the insertion/substitution vector system of the Bacteriophage T4 in its host, Escherichia coli. While the figure shows a plaque assay, that visualization results from an in-frame deletion of the 39.2 gene of T4, which is believed to modulate the host's (E. coli) GroEL/GroES chaperone machine, which aids in the correct folding of both host and bacteriophage proteins. |
complete CACAO 13727
| on BPT4:D9IE38
| Flagged
|
Public Assessment | Ivanerill | 2019-04-18 09:19:23 CDT | | Requires Changes
✔ Protein ✔ Publication ✗ Qualifier ✗ Go term ✗ Evidence ✔ With/From ✗ Notes ✔ Unique/Original
|