GONUTS has been updated to MW1.31 Most things seem to be working but be sure to report problems.
Cacao
| Contributes to | GO:0004519 | endonuclease activity | PMID:16873236 | IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay | F | |||
| This annotation made on page: I34A1:PA By: RPatel (group Team Green B 2018) on 2018-04-22 08:28:29 CDT. | ||||||||
You must be logged in to challenge this annotation.
| Entry Type | Challenging User,Group | Time/Date | Challenge Reason | Points/Assessment | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Challenge | MKoert, Team Red A 2018 | 2018-04-22 19:52:54 CDT | You state that an endonuclease assay was performed but you didn't mention what the endonuclease assay entailed. Additionally I am confused by the context of your last line, "However, the activity is still apparent without the use of mutant phenotypes." I think both of these issues would be clarified by some additional detail given about some of the experimental procedures. Lastly if they are using mutant phenotype to determine the mechanism as you claim wouldn't the evidence code be inferred from mutant phenotype? | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Public Assessment | Ivanerill | 2018-05-02 09:46:17 CDT | No notes given. | Acceptable ✔ Protein ✔ Publication ✔ Qualifier ✔ Go term ✔ Evidence ✔ With/From ✔ Notes ✔ Unique/Original | ||||||||||||||||||
| Public Assessment | DanielRenfro | 2018-04-30 10:18:02 CDT | This annotation has been flagged because it has been edited since last assessment
| Flagged | ||||||||||||||||||
| Public Assessment | Ivanerill | 2018-04-30 06:17:57 CDT | As noted by the challenge, your notes are more confusing than illuminating, and your evidence code is not correct. Please address both. | Requires Changes ✔ Protein ✔ Publication ✔ Qualifier ✔ Go term ✗ Evidence ✔ With/From ✗ Notes ✔ Unique/Original |
