GONUTS has been updated to MW1.31 Most things seem to be working but be sure to report problems.
Cacao
| GO:0005634 | nucleus | PMID:11091361 | IMP: Inferred from Mutant Phenotype | C | ||||
| This annotation made on page: By: Knuut002 (group Dang Anything Else) on 2011-12-05 15:24:38 CST. | ||||||||
You must be logged in to challenge this annotation.
| Entry Type | Challenging User,Group | Time/Date | Challenge Reason | Points/Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Challenge | Schis004, The Originator | 2011-12-15 01:09:00 CST | GO term "nucleus" does not correctly explain the actual function. I believe it should deal with hindbrain development (GO:0030902). This is shown in the background and introduction sections. Although mutations are talked about in the article, PCR was used for figure 1A (evidence code IDA). | 0 |
| Challenge | Schis004, The Originator | 2011-12-15 01:08:57 CST | GO term "nucleus" does not correctly explain the actual function. I believe it should deal with hindbrain development (GO:0030902). This is shown in the background and introduction sections. Although mutations are talked about in the article, PCR was used for figure 1A (evidence code IDA). | 0 |
| Challenge | Schis004, The Originator | 2011-12-15 01:08:33 CST | GO term "nucleus" does not correctly explain the actual function. I believe it should deal with hindbrain development (GO:0030902). This is shown in the background and introduction sections. Although mutations are talked about in the article, PCR was used for figure 1A (evidence code IDA). | 0 |
| Challenge | Schis004, The Originator | 2011-12-15 01:05:08 CST | GO term "nucleus" does not correctly explain the actual function. I believe it should deal with hindbrain development (GO:0030902). This is shown in the background and introduction sections. Although mutations are talked about in the article, PCR was used for figure 1A (evidence code IDA). | 0 |
| Challenge | Minsk005, Scary Elevator | 2011-12-12 15:40:01 CST | This article does not contain the go term "nucleus". The article involves gene mutations, but does not directly involve the nucleus. | 3 |
| Public Assessment | Bmcintosh | 2011-12-21 20:10:45 CST | I agree with the challenge from Scary Elevator that this is not an appropriate annotation. I did not award points to The Originator because fixing this annotation would mean a different cellular component term, not a biological process term. | Unacceptable |
| Private Assessment | Sgouni | 2011-12-21 13:06:49 CST | You need to be an instructor to view these notes. | Unacceptable |
| Private Assessment | Sgouni | 2011-12-21 12:47:48 CST | You need to be an instructor to view these notes. | Unacceptable |
