GONUTS has been updated to MW1.31 Most things seem to be working but be sure to report problems.
Cacao
GO:0017053 | transcriptional repressor complex | PMID:12426390 | IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay | C | ||||
This annotation made on page: BPPH2:NP By: Puglisk1 (group Team Blue-B) on 2017-04-05 10:33:09 CDT. |
You must be logged in to challenge this annotation.
Entry Type | Challenging User,Group | Time/Date | Challenge Reason | Points/Assessment | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Challenge | Soyarsc, Team Cyborg | 2017-04-12 10:33:56 CDT | In addition to not stating which figure (already challenged by another user), notes do not include information about how the gel displays activity of repression complex. | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||
Challenge | Garlingrk, Team ZIRTS | 2017-04-12 09:13:20 CDT | It is unclear what figure displays the wild-type gel from which the repressor function is indicated in the paper. | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Public Assessment | Ivanerill | 2017-05-24 06:09:39 CDT | No notes given. | Acceptable ✔ Protein ✔ Publication ✔ Qualifier ✔ Go term ✔ Evidence ✔ With/From ✔ Notes ✔ Unique/Original | ||||||||||||||||||
Public Assessment | DanielRenfro | 2017-04-17 09:21:59 CDT | This annotation has been flagged because it has been edited since last assessment
| Flagged | ||||||||||||||||||
Public Assessment | Ivanerill | 2017-04-15 17:05:02 CDT | To validate direct interaction in Fig.1 the authors use IMP, as outlined in another annotation. The w-t lane by itself does not provide evidence of trans. repressor complex. It might show transcription activity (which would be a different annotation), but not necessarily complex (the two proteins could interact indirectly by binding DNA at different locations). If annotating complex you should use WITH to indicate the other participating molecule. | Requires Changes ✔ Protein ✔ Publication ✔ Qualifier ✗ Go term ✔ Evidence ✗ With/From ✗ Notes ✔ Unique/Original |