Cacao

DNA binding terms are prohibited. I assume that no notes were contributed due to the full text not being available via PubMed. However, proof of annotation is required through figures displayed in the paper. Figures from the paper must either be added or a different paper should be used as reference. From the abstract, it does not seem as though experiments are being conducted through IDA. Only sequence and probable gene products are mentioned. If this paper does not specifically show experimental data relating to function of the gene products, it may not be ideal to use. If the paper is used, an evidence code related to sequence should be shown (it is difficult to say which one based off of the abstract).

Hello Rachele Bonasera... again,

There appears to be nothing in your notes from the PubMed article providing evidence as to why this is a single-stranded DNA binding... again. It would be quite helpful if you found a figure in the article pointing to the message you are trying to convey.

I wasn't able to find the full PubMed article, but from the abstract I believe IDA would be better evidence than IMP. There is no mention of a mutant phenotype, and the article is more about how the authors sequenced the entire early region of this particular phage. I would try and find the full article and cite a figure or table that shows them identifying single-stranded DNA binding protein in the early region, because from the abstract there is no mention of that protein.