GONUTS has been updated to MW1.31 Most things seem to be working but be sure to report problems.
Cacao
| incorrect (CACAO) | GO:1903627 | regulation of dUTP diphosphatase activity | PMID:381286 | IMP: Inferred from Mutant Phenotype | P | |||
| This annotation made on page: 9CAUD:S5Y020 By: Gjulie (group TeamGreen) on 2015-04-06 08:51:31 CDT. | ||||||||
You must be logged in to challenge this annotation.
| Entry Type | Challenging User,Group | Time/Date | Challenge Reason | Points/Assessment | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Challenge | Scaruso, ? | 2015-05-03 15:16:58 CDT | Your notes are describing a transfer annotation, not a regular annotation, which is what you need to do here. IMP is likely correct, but you will want to cite the part of the paper that demonstrates that information as the evidence (eg, a figure #). Remember, this annotation is about the gene in T5, you make the connection to a Bacillus phage in another annotation. | None, yet. | ||||||||||||||||||
| Challenge | Kelizabeth, TeamBlue | 2015-04-09 18:37:28 CDT | This annotation is not a transfer, and points to troll gene 122. However, the experimental paper references Bacteriophage T5. | None, yet. | ||||||||||||||||||
| Public Assessment | Scaruso | 2015-05-12 14:09:44 CDT | This was identified as a Troll Gene (9CAUD), so this would have to be a transfer annotation with GO_REF:0000100. Otherwise, you need to do a regular annotation for dUTP phosphatase or dUTP phosphatase activity in phage T5. | Unacceptable ✗ Qualifier ✗ Go term ✗ Evidence ✗ With/From ✗ Notes | ||||||||||||||||||
| Public Assessment | DanielRenfro | 2015-05-10 19:25:32 CDT | This annotation has been flagged because it has been edited since last assessment
| Flagged | ||||||||||||||||||
| Public Assessment | Scaruso | 2015-05-03 16:20:06 CDT | Go term is incorrect. You are describing dUTPase, not a regulator of dUTPase. | Requires Changes ✗ Go term | ||||||||||||||||||
| Public Assessment | Scaruso | 2015-05-03 15:30:56 CDT | Your notes are describing a transfer annotation, not a regular annotation, which is what you need to do here. IMP is likely correct, but you will want to cite the part of the paper that demonstrates that information as the evidence (eg, a figure #). Remember, this annotation is about the gene in T5, you make the connection to a Bacillus phage in another annotation. | Requires Changes ✗ Evidence ✗ Notes |
