GONUTS has been updated to MW1.31 Most things seem to be working but be sure to report problems.

Have any questions? Please email us at ecoliwiki@gmail.com

Category:MichSt14A 9

From GONUTS
Jump to: navigation, search
StatusPageUserDate/TimeGO Term (Aspect)ReferenceEvidenceNotesLinks
requireschanges?Hardin57, MichSt14A 92014-04-06 12:37:34 CDTGO:2000028 regulation of photoperiodism, flowering (In addition to changes in leaf characteristics, flowering time was also affected by STO in both LD and SD conditions (Figure 1H–K). Over-expression of STO promoted flowering in both LD (Figure 1H and J) and SD (Figure 1I and K) while loss of STO delayed flowering relative to the WT but only in SD

Figure 4cd: Uses qRT-PCR to show that when STO is over-expressed the expression of flowering genes FT and SOC1, is significantly greater. In a STO mutant the genes are significantly lower.

Figure 5: Shows via qRT-PCR that STO down regulates FLC (which down regulates FT and SOC1) and increases FT and SOC expression independently of each other.)
PMID:24498334IMP: Inferred from Mutant Phenotype
challenge
acceptable9CARY:V9P4U0Hardin57, MichSt14A 92014-04-02 21:17:25 CDTGO:0009819 drought recovery (P)PMID:24682461ECO:0000315 mutant phenotype evidence used in manual assertion

Figure 2: Shows both that slNAC1 is expressed more in the leaves than other parts of the plant (more susceptible to desiccation) and that it is expressed more under drought conditions.

Figure 5: Shows that slNAC1 expressing plants recovered from drought and continued to grow and produce seeds while non-slNAC1 expressing plants generally died.

challenge
acceptable9CARY:V9P4U0Hardin57, MichSt14A 92014-04-02 17:56:16 CDTGO:0045893 positive regulation of transcription, DNA-templated (P)PMID:24682461ECO:0000315 mutant phenotype evidence used in manual assertion

Fig 4: Uses a yeast-one-hybrid screen to reveal that only transformants containing the slNAC1 gene were able to grow on a medium without His, Trp or Ade. Furthermore, only these transformants showed beta-galactosidase activity indicating transcription activation. To further support these results, Fig 3 uses a GFP protein construct to show that slNAC1 is localized in the nucleus.

challenge
updatedbyinstructorCANAL:NCE2Hardin57, MichSt14A 92014-03-31 22:14:58 CDTGO:0007015 actin filament organization (P)PMID:24281718ECO:0000315 mutant phenotype evidence used in manual assertion

Figure 7a shows that in comparison with the wild type, a mutated Nce102 gene causes actin mislocalization. Fig 7b shows that the cells were also more round that the wild type which can indicate an actin defect

challenge
unacceptableSOYBN:C7SQI9Hardin57, MichSt14A 92014-03-31 14:38:17 CDTGO:0044798 nuclear transcription factor complex (C)PMID:24634113ECO:0000315 mutant phenotype evidence used in manual assertion

Figure 5: Shows that GmPTF1 is located in the nucleus

Figure 6: Used yeast clones and beta-galactosidase assays to show that the N-terminal and C-terminal domains of the full GmPTF1 are used to activate transcription. Only when both are functional can the reporter genes for Ade, Ura and his be activated Figure 7: Shows via qRT-PCR that GmPTF1 expression was induced in soybean varieties more tolerant to phosphate starvation. Time point sampling of plant organs showed that phosphate starvation induced the expression in the tolerant plants. This shows that GmPTF1 is likely a transcription factor involved in phosphate starvation response.

challenge
acceptableVIBAL:D0WWP7Hardin57, MichSt14A 92014-03-31 13:40:27 CDTGO:2000147 positive regulation of cell motility (P)PMID:22130678ECO:0000315 mutant phenotype evidence used in manual assertion

Fig 3: Uses agar colony growth as well as qRT-PCR descriptions of the amount of lafK, a swarming regulator gene, to shows that in comparison with cells expressing LuxT, those with the gene knocked out have decreased swarming ability and general motility.

challenge
updatedbyinstructorVIBAL:D0WWP7Hardin57, MichSt14A 92014-03-31 13:40:27 CDTGO:1902573 positive regulation of serine-type peptidase activity (P)PMID:22130678ECO:0000315 mutant phenotype evidence used in manual assertion

Figure 3a: Shows that LuxT positively regulates the productions of extracellular protease (characterized endotoxins). This was detected using gene mutants and a HPA coloration assay to detect the extracellular protease levels.

Figure 3b: Includes a western blot that shows extracellular protease production is markedly decreased in a LuxT knockout. These results indicate that LuxT positively regulated extracellular protease production which further indicates that LuxT regulates endotoxin activity.

challenge
updatedbyinstructorVIBAL:D0WWP7Hardin57, MichSt14A 92014-03-31 13:40:26 CDTGO:0007165 signal transduction (P)PMID:22130678ECO:0000315 mutant phenotype evidence used in manual assertion

Figure 2

challenge
acceptableTHECC:L7TUW7Hardin57, MichSt14A 92014-03-31 10:16:39 CDTGO:0051245 negative regulation of cellular defense response (P)PMID:24314063ECO:0000315 mutant phenotype evidence used in manual assertion

Fig 4: Shows that certain groups of NPR3 mutants which have decreased expression have decreased lesion sizes when inoculated with pathogenic bacteria.

Fig 5: Shows that in transgenic plants designed to express or not express NPR3, NPR3 expressing plants are less resistant to pathogenic lesions.

challenge

What do the icons mean in the status column?

assessment icons.jpg

Pages in category "MichSt14A 9"

This category contains only the following page.