Cacao

For GO Term: Please see the top right of page 2805. Table 1 cites the genes, and top right of page 2805 states function.

For Evidence: This experiment is a microarray experiment that compares two separate mutants. This puts it into a confusing category because scientists should acknowledge that IEP means that the GO term listed could be associated with a downstream effect of knocking the gene out. However, at the same time, the evidence code is that of an IMP because microarrays can be taken with cells that are given one treatment or another. Since IMP also suggests that the mutant phenotype was observed and since an IEP doesn't account for causality, both points should be clear. Since there is no way to mark both in a single evidence code, I marked both of these topics. The evidence code is thus unclear and it was discussed with a judge and the conclusion was that after the GO convention next month a decision can be made as to what the proper evidence code is.

This Go term has been added twice each time with a different evidence code.

Which evidence code did you finally decide on? Its not clear whether its IMP or IEP which is mentioned next.

I checked the experimental evidence, Table 1 is on page 2803, this needs to be explained more because its not clear how u derived your Go term.