GONUTS has been updated to MW1.31 Most things seem to be working but be sure to report problems.
Cacao
| Contributes to | GO:0019073 | viral DNA genome packaging | PMID:16376938 | IMP: Inferred from Mutant Phenotype | P | |||
| This annotation made on page: BPPH2:PKG16 By: Bhorne1 (group Team Blue-A) on 2017-04-07 19:36:59 CDT. | ||||||||
You must be logged in to challenge this annotation.
| Entry Type | Challenging User,Group | Time/Date | Challenge Reason | Points/Assessment | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Challenge | Bhorne1, Team Blue-A | 2017-04-12 10:38:03 CDT | Figure 1. of the referenced paper suggest that gp16 is a factor during DNA packaging. Also suggesting that gp3, works non-specifically to bind independent from gp3. Results show that gp16 was able to bind, similar to wild type with out gp3. | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Challenge | Bhorne1, Team Blue-A | 2017-04-12 10:38:02 CDT | Figure 1. of the referenced paper suggest that gp16 is a factor during DNA packaging. Also suggesting that gp3, works non-specifically to bind independent from gp3. Results show that gp16 was able to bind, similar to wild type with out gp3. | None, yet. | ||||||||||||||||||
| Challenge | Bhorne1, Team Blue-A | 2017-04-12 10:38:00 CDT | Figure 1. of the referenced paper suggest that gp16 is a factor during DNA packaging. Also suggesting that gp3, works non-specifically to bind independent from gp3. Results show that gp16 was able to bind, similar to wild type with out gp3. | None, yet. | ||||||||||||||||||
| Challenge | Kentbh, Team Phage Queens | 2017-04-12 07:55:40 CDT | There are no notes to reference a figure and support your claim that the function is viral DNA genome packaging. | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Private Assessment | Ivanerill | 2017-05-25 04:24:46 CDT | You need to be an instructor to view these notes. | Updated by Instructor ✔ Protein ✔ Publication ✔ Qualifier ✔ Go term ✔ Evidence ✔ With/From ✔ Notes ✔ Unique/Original | ||||||||||||||||||
| Public Assessment | Ivanerill | 2017-05-23 06:15:07 CDT | The manuscript adequately demonstrates that gp16 binds both DNA and pRNA, thereby backing up prior data to conclude that gp16 is an active participant in viral packaging. However, the note refers to figure 1, where only data showing that it binds DNA (a weaker claim) is shown. Figure 5 or 6 would provide much better evidence for the process. Note also that Figure 1 is a binding assay not using any mutants (gp3 is removed through column), hence not IMP. The annotation can be easily fixed, but should get no credit. | Requires Changes ✔ Protein ✔ Publication ✔ Qualifier ✔ Go term ✗ Evidence ✔ With/From ✗ Notes ✔ Unique/Original | ||||||||||||||||||
| Public Assessment | Scaruso | 2017-05-18 13:06:13 CDT | Figure 1 shows that gp16 binds to DNA+gp3. This may not be a great figure choice for biological process, GO:0019073 viral DNA genome packaging (P). | Flagged ✔ Protein ✔ Publication ✔ Qualifier ✗ Go term ✔ Evidence ✔ With/From ✗ Notes ✔ Unique/Original | ||||||||||||||||||
| Public Assessment | DanielRenfro | 2017-04-17 09:50:36 CDT | This annotation has been flagged because it has been edited since last assessment
| Flagged | ||||||||||||||||||
| Public Assessment | DanielRenfro | 2017-04-17 09:50:34 CDT | This annotation has been flagged because it has been edited since last assessment
| Flagged | ||||||||||||||||||
| Public Assessment | Ivanerill | 2017-04-15 18:53:38 CDT | Missing notes. | Requires Changes ✔ Notes |
