GONUTS has been updated to MW1.31 Most things seem to be working but be sure to report problems.
Cacao
| GO:0031521 | spitzenkorper | PMID:28034798 | IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay | C | ||||
| This annotation made on page: EMENI:Q5ASQ8 By: SarahCouv (group Team Lily Whale) on 2017-02-02 15:18:02 CST. | ||||||||
You must be logged in to challenge this annotation.
| Entry Type | Challenging User,Group | Time/Date | Challenge Reason | Points/Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Challenge | PKennedyTX1, Team Daytona Bronze Viper | 2017-02-07 14:30:45 CST | Figure 1A is not sufficient evidence to show the localization of either DnfB or DnfA. That figure shows the effect when the DnfA or DnfB are deleted. It is shown that only DnfA has a significant effect on the location of the SPK tip on the hyphae. Another thing that was not made super clear is that the DnfA and DnfB are flipases. Although it is a component I challenge that location of these flipases and the evidence used to support them. IDA and IMP would be more effective at explaining the location of the the enzymes. According to the paper it seems as if they localize to the same regions and have different effects on the hyphae tip. | 0 |
| Private Assessment | Suzialeksander | 2017-02-21 13:44:02 CST | You need to be an instructor to view these notes. | Acceptable ✔ Protein ✔ Publication ✔ Qualifier ✔ Go term ✔ Evidence ✔ With/From ✔ Notes ✔ Unique/Original |
| Public Assessment | Suzialeksander | 2017-02-21 13:20:46 CST | I don't even know what the challenge is saying. | Acceptable ✔ Protein ✔ Publication ✔ Qualifier ✔ Go term ✔ Evidence ✔ With/From ✔ Notes ✔ Unique/Original |
