GONUTS has been updated to MW1.31 Most things seem to be working but be sure to report problems.
Cacao
Contributes to | GO:0003677 | DNA binding | PMID:18157148 | IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay | F | |||
This annotation made on page: BPSPP:Q38152 By: Flounlackerkm (group Team DirtyChubi) on 2016-04-25 10:13:47 CDT. |
You must be logged in to challenge this annotation.
Entry Type | Challenging User,Group | Time/Date | Challenge Reason | Points/Assessment | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Challenge | Kaycee.Bartels, Team Tiger1 | 2016-04-29 23:41:55 CDT | First of all, binding terms are not allowed so this would not be valid. Looking at Figure 1 and Figure 4 I do not see anything even related to DNA binding. Figure 4 has the bulk of information on this gene, and it is showing helicase activity and helicase-primase interactions. Using the information from this figure, I would suggest the GO term: DNA Helicase activity (GO:0003678). | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Private Assessment | Suzialeksander | 2016-06-28 14:56:16 CDT | You need to be an instructor to view these notes. | Updated by Instructor | ||||||||||||||||||
Private Assessment | Suzialeksander | 2016-06-28 14:52:37 CDT | You need to be an instructor to view these notes. | Updated by Instructor | ||||||||||||||||||
Private Assessment | Suzialeksander | 2016-05-23 13:41:04 CDT | You need to be an instructor to view these notes. | Requires Changes ✔ Protein ✔ Publication ✗ Qualifier ✗ Go term ✔ Evidence ✔ With/From ✗ Notes ✔ Unique/Original | ||||||||||||||||||
Public Assessment | AAJohnson | 2016-05-16 09:03:11 CDT | 5/11 entry looks good. | Acceptable ✔ Protein ✔ Publication ✔ Qualifier ✔ Go term ✔ Evidence ✔ With/From ✔ Notes ✔ Unique/Original | ||||||||||||||||||
Public Assessment | DanielRenfro | 2016-05-11 07:58:56 CDT | This annotation has been flagged because it has been edited since last assessment
| Flagged | ||||||||||||||||||
Public Assessment | AAJohnson | 2016-05-09 08:59:40 CDT | This annotation is very close. For an IMP submission, you should describe the nature of the mutation with more specificity (your description of 4e isn't complete, and is better for 4d). What is the assay shown in 4e, and how does a mutant phenotype support the GO term you chose? You should probably also include data from Table 1 describing their mutation studies! It is o.k. to pick one mutant and follow it's path through the assays to support the GO term for DNA unwinding. You might also find a GO term for interaction with primase and submit an additional annotation with that evidence. | Requires Changes ✔ Protein ✔ Publication ✔ Qualifier ✔ Go term ✔ Evidence ✔ With/From ✗ Notes ✔ Unique/Original | ||||||||||||||||||
Public Assessment | DanielRenfro | 2016-05-06 12:40:45 CDT | This annotation has been flagged because it has been edited since last assessment
| Flagged | ||||||||||||||||||
Public Assessment | AAJohnson | 2016-05-03 15:52:03 CDT | This annotation has problems with the Go term (see the GONUTS rules, you can't use "binding"), and therefore with the notes and evidence. I might suggest GO:0032508 "DNA Duplex Unwinding" as a GO term. Evidence from Figure 4f should be clearly explained- you will have to work to understand how adding helicase to a primase assay shows unwinding of the DNA. "IMP" evidence code should be used if you describe an experiment using a mutant helicase protein. | Requires Changes ✔ Protein ✔ Publication ✔ Qualifier ✗ Go term ✗ Evidence ✔ With/From ✗ Notes ✔ Unique/Original |