GONUTS has been updated to MW1.31 Most things seem to be working but be sure to report problems.
Cacao
Contributes to | GO:0006268 | DNA unwinding involved in DNA replication | other:PMC3729639 | IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay | P | |||
This annotation made on page: 9CAUD:S5YPI0 By: Pclarence (group TeamGreen) on 2015-04-08 09:18:30 CDT. |
You must be logged in to challenge this annotation.
Entry Type | Challenging User,Group | Time/Date | Challenge Reason | Points/Assessment | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Public Assessment | Scaruso | 2015-05-12 14:32:46 CDT | This was identified as a Troll Gene (9CAUD), so this would have to be a transfer annotation with GO_REF:0000100. Otherwise, you need to do a regular annotation for helicase or helicase activity in phage T4. | Unacceptable ✗ Publication ✗ Qualifier ✗ Go term ✗ With/From ✗ Notes | ||||||||||||||||||
Public Assessment | DanielRenfro | 2015-05-10 22:07:52 CDT | This annotation has been flagged because it has been edited since last assessment
| Flagged | ||||||||||||||||||
Public Assessment | Scaruso | 2015-05-03 16:42:14 CDT | You found a good source but the notes are wrong, perhaps from a different annotation? These look like the notes for a Phage Hunters (Transfer) annotation with the BlastP data. Instead, you need to talk about what in the paper (you can fined both IDA and IMP in there) that supports the Regular Annotation and write it up. Use the example in the instructions as a guide. If Troll has the same gene, you could then do an additional Transfer annotation very easily since you have already done the work. | Requires Changes ✗ Evidence ✗ Notes |