CACAO Spring 2018
My Annotations
Status | Page | Date/Time | GO Term (Aspect) | Reference | Evidence | Notes | Links |
---|
updatedbyinstructor | CAEEL:RFS1 | 2018-04-11 10:18:48 CDT | GO:0000730 DNA recombinase assembly (P) | PMID:27867009 | ECO:0000316 genetic interaction evidence used in manual assertion | Figure 1 depicts the cessation of the dissociation of RAD-51 from ssDNA due to the presence of protein RFS-1/RIP-1. Figure 1, Part H [(i), (ii)] shows the known mechanism of RAD-51 by demonstrating that it’s presence prohibits the binding of ScRPA-eGFP-ssDNA. The incapability of RAD-51 to be expressed due to the lack of ATP is found in Figure 1, Part H (ii). Figure 1 ultimately illustrates that in the precence of the protein RFS-1/RIP-1 and ATP; RAD-51 along with the protein RFS-1/RIP-1 is present but the ScRPA-eGFP-ssDNA are not [(Figure 1, Part H (iii)]. The same events occur when the protein RFS-1/RIP-1 is present but not ATP [(Figure 1, Part H (iv)].
| challenge |
updatedbyinstructor | CAEEL:RFS1 | 2018-04-13 08:05:13 CDT | GO:0000730 DNA recombinase assembly (P) | PMID:26186187 | ECO:0000316 genetic interaction evidence used in manual assertion | Figure 2 provides the biochemical properties of the RFS-1/RIP-1 complex. The western blot in part A of this figure confirms the precence of the two proteins (RFS-1/RIP-1) after co-purifying the recombinant proteins from budding yeast cells. The Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA) shown in part B of the figure reveals that the RFS-1/RIP-1 complex binds in a nucleotide independent manner weakly to ssDNA but not dsDNA. Bands are observed only for ssDNA. The RFS-1/RIP-1 complex can also stimulate D loop formations with RAD51 (C) and the fact that ATP is required to do so (D).
| challenge |
acceptable:0
unacceptable:0
requires_changes:0
flagged:0
Annotations challenged by Sdorlean
Status | Author,Group | Page | GO Term (Aspect) | Reference | Evidence | Links | Page history |
---|
0 annotations fixed by Sdorlean
What do the icons mean in the status column?