GONUTS has been updated to MW1.31 Most things seem to be working but be sure to report problems.
Cacao
| GO:0000902 | cell morphogenesis | PMID:9324260 | IGI: Inferred from Genetic Interaction UniProtKB:p02918 UniProtKB:p0aeb2 | P | ||||
| This annotation made on page: ECOLI:AMPH By: Chane001 (group Team Biohazard) on 2012-02-07 18:46:12 CST. | ||||||||
You must be logged in to challenge this annotation.
| Entry Type | Challenging User,Group | Time/Date | Challenge Reason | Points/Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Challenge | Galante1, Team Sparty's Chicken Pesto | 2012-04-22 14:43:56 CDT | Figure 9 only shows growth effects when the gene is mutated/deleted this does not allow one to infer functionality. Try looking for a different figure to support your annotation. Also this paper suggests AmpH is a binding protein which is invalid in this competition | 1 |
| Challenge | Gunde016, Team Jacob | 2012-02-19 13:46:24 CST | They should have used the evidence code IMP and they should note the page 6117. On this page the authors mention that ampC and ampH, when deleted (mutant), the cells' shapes were not symmetrical. "individual cells had uneven contours, and the constrictions between dividing cells were aberrant and asymmetric". | 2 |
| Challenge | Jonas008, Team Genetic Mystery Machine | 2012-02-18 15:41:28 CST | Evidence code should be IDA. | 0 |
| Private Assessment | Bmcintosh | 2012-02-14 19:14:07 CST | You need to be an instructor to view these notes. | Requires Changes |
| Private Assessment | Bmcintosh | 2012-02-14 19:13:41 CST | You need to be an instructor to view these notes. | Acceptable |
| Private Assessment | Bmcintosh | 2012-02-14 19:12:52 CST | You need to be an instructor to view these notes. | Unacceptable |
| Public Assessment | Suzialeksander | 2012-02-14 18:10:44 CST | Since the user did not incorporate the feedback, here is what they were told: I went over some of your annotations and had a couple of things to point out. On your work for E Coli ampH: 1. Consider using the child term GO:0000903 ! cell morphogenesis during vegetative growth. See if this might work better. 2. Your Evidence Code needs a little more info. The use of any code other than IDA or IMP is usually a red flag to people looking to challenge so I recommend changing it, or keep it and alter your notes. If you refer to CS357-3, you can use IMP, if you meant the double CS420-2 keep your code (I recommend this)- but either way be specific. 3. Although you're on the right track about using the with/from field, if you're using IGI you need to put in the accession for ampH too (more important than the ones you have now). | Requires Changes |
