GONUTS has been updated to MW1.31 Most things seem to be working but be sure to report problems.
Cacao
| GO:0034061 | DNA polymerase activity | PMID:4622590 | IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay | F | ||||
| This annotation made on page: 9CAUD:A0A024B145 By: Corneljl (group Team Phages Woo!) on 2016-04-11 03:44:16 CDT. | ||||||||
You must be logged in to challenge this annotation.
| Entry Type | Challenging User,Group | Time/Date | Challenge Reason | Points/Assessment | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Challenge | Giesslca, Team Go Dogs Go | 2016-03-30 15:22:55 CDT | Any annotation with Evoli should be a transfer annotation. | None, yet. | ||||||||||||||||||
| Challenge | Adkinssm, Team Syndicate | 2016-03-30 15:05:58 CDT | I do not believe this gene is homologous with the DNA polymerase gene in SPO1. I am not sure how you came to this conclusion, and if you could at least provide some clarity that would be helpful. I submitted the sequence to HHPred and found that this protein is homologous with Mre11-Rad50, a DNA double-strand break repair protein in Methanocaldococcus jannaschii (found here: http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore.do?structureId=3AV0). If you determine this is actually the case, a suitable GO term may be "double-strand break repair"-GO:0006302. | None, yet. | ||||||||||||||||||
| Challenge | Adkinssm, Team Syndicate | 2016-03-30 15:05:56 CDT | I do not believe this gene is homologous with the DNA polymerase gene in SPO1. I am not sure how you came to this conclusion, and if you could at least provide some clarity that would be helpful. I submitted the sequence to HHPred and found that this protein is homologous with Mre11-Rad50, a DNA double-strand break repair protein in Methanocaldococcus jannaschii (found here: http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore.do?structureId=3AV0). If you determine this is actually the case, a suitable GO term may be "double-strand break repair"-GO:0006302. | None, yet. | ||||||||||||||||||
| Challenge | Mnguy1, Team Blue B | 2016-03-30 14:25:36 CDT | This reference shows that DNA polymerase activity stays the same after injected to the pol-phage, but after 10 min, there is a huge increase in activity of polymerase within the cell which proved by increasing in DNA synthesis level. The source is more bout DNA polymerase activity as biological process than as a complex - cellular component. | None, yet. | ||||||||||||||||||
| Challenge | Hazardb, Team Snorlax | 2016-03-30 10:35:37 CDT | I am challenging this annotation because the phage described in the notes of this annotation (evoli phage) is not the same phage as mentioned in the pubmed paper. The phage mentioned in the paper is named phage SPO1. The paper describes how phage SPO1 infects the mutant pol- bacillus subtilis, but the mutant pol- bacillus subtilis does not include a DNA polymerase. The phage does include a DNA polymerase and when injected into the mutant pol- bacillus subtilis, the phage SPO1 begins to replicate itself, and this can be seen in figure 4 of the paper. | None, yet. | ||||||||||||||||||
| Challenge | E63, Team Blue A | 2016-03-30 09:50:37 CDT | This should be a direct annotation on the species page that the scientists used in the PubMed paper (not to Phage Evoli) and then make another transfer annotation. | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Private Assessment | Suzialeksander | 2016-06-17 13:05:59 CDT | You need to be an instructor to view these notes. | Unacceptable | ||||||||||||||||||
| Public Assessment | JimHu | 2016-05-02 12:17:00 CDT | Can't make direct annotations to Evoli. Any direct annotations should be made on a different gene. | Requires Changes ✗ Publication ✗ Evidence | ||||||||||||||||||
| Public Assessment | DanielRenfro | 2016-04-11 15:44:17 CDT | This annotation has been flagged because it has been edited since last assessment
| Flagged | ||||||||||||||||||
| Public Assessment | Suzialeksander | 2016-04-10 22:38:18 CDT | I didn't read this paper at all, so I cannot assess the annotation, but I caution you all:
This is NOT the same as
Compare both the definitions if you're unsure, and remember to FIX your own annotations if you've misused a Component term when you wanted a Function or Process term. Again, I'm NOT saying this current one is incorrect or not, but this is a commonly misused term. | Flagged |
