GONUTS has been updated to MW1.31 Most things seem to be working but be sure to report problems.
PMID:2535466
Citation |
Bowman, JL, Smyth, DR and Meyerowitz, EM (1989) Genes directing flower development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 1:37-52 |
---|---|
Abstract |
We describe the effects of four recessive homeotic mutations that specifically disrupt the development of flowers in Arabidopsis thaliana. Each of the recessive mutations affects the outcome of organ development, but not the location of organ primordia. Homeotic transformations observed are as follows. In agamous-1, stamens to petals; in apetala2-1, sepals to leaves and petals to staminoid petals; in apetala3-1, petals to sepals and stamens to carpels; in pistillata-1, petals to sepals. In addition, two of these mutations (ap2-1 and pi-1) result in loss of organs, and ag-1 causes the cells that would ordinarily form the gynoecium to differentiate as a flower. Two of the mutations are temperature-sensitive. Temperature shift experiments indicate that the wild-type AP2 gene product acts at the time of primordium initiation; the AP3 product is active later. It seems that the wild-type alleles of these four genes allow cells to determine their place in the developing flower and thus to differentiate appropriately. We propose that these genes may be involved in setting up or responding to concentric, overlapping fields within the flower primordium. |
Links |
PubMed PMC159735 Online version:10.1105/tpc.1.1.37 |
Keywords |
Alleles; Genes, Recessive; Microscopy, Electron, Scanning; Mutation; Phenotype; Plant Development; Plants/genetics; Plants/ultrastructure |
edit table |
Significance
Annotations
Gene product | Qualifier | GO Term | Evidence Code | with/from | Aspect | Extension | Notes | Status |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GO:0048438: floral whorl development |
ECO:0000315: |
P |
Fig 1B, Figure 2B shows the SEM micrograph of four stages of flower development, with a nested flower (sepals and petals replacing stamens and carpels). Table 1 summarizes their findings, with the third and fourth whorl of mutant flowers differing from wild-type. |
complete | ||||
involved_in |
GO:0048438: floral whorl development |
ECO:0000315: mutant phenotype evidence used in manual assertion |
P |
Seeded From UniProt |
complete | |||
GO:0010093: specification of floral organ identity |
ECO:0000315: |
P |
Figure 2C shows the SEM micrograph of four stages of flower development, with sepals replaced by leaves. Table 1 summarizes the findings, with the first and second whorl of mutant flowers differing from wild-type, varying depending on temperature. |
complete | ||||
involved_in |
GO:0010093: specification of floral organ identity |
ECO:0000315: mutant phenotype evidence used in manual assertion |
P |
Seeded From UniProt |
complete | |||
GO:0010093: specification of floral organ identity |
ECO:0000315: |
P |
Figure 2D shows the SEM micrograph of four stages of flower development, with sepals developing in place of petals. Table 1 summarizes the findings, with the second and third whorl of mutant flowers differing from wild-type, varying depending on temperature. The higher the temperature, the more altered the organs. |
complete | ||||
involved_in |
GO:0010093: specification of floral organ identity |
ECO:0000315: mutant phenotype evidence used in manual assertion |
P |
Seeded From UniProt |
complete | |||
GO:0010093: specification of floral organ identity |
ECO:0000315: |
P |
Figure 2E shows the SEM micrograph of four stages of flower development, with no third whorl. Table 1 summarizes their findings, with the second, third, and fourth whorl of mutant flowers differing from wild-type. |
complete | ||||
involved_in |
GO:0010093: specification of floral organ identity |
ECO:0000315: mutant phenotype evidence used in manual assertion |
P |
Seeded From UniProt |
complete | |||
See also
References
See Help:References for how to manage references in GONUTS.